Looking for the M Star
M type stars
According to (Cohn et al. 2010):
The fairly high R-band flux indicates that the secondaries are relatively massive, \(\approx 0.5-0.7 \, M_{\odot}\)._
This would mean that the companion star is either an M or K type star. If it is an M type star we should be able to see some Titanium lines. To see what magnitude they have I searched in the public MUSE data release of the Globular Cluster (http://muse-vlt.eu/science/globular-cluster-ngc-6397/). The stars have the id from the ACS Survey if Globular Clusters (Anderson et al. 2008). I searched in this catalog for the right V-I in the VEGA System magnitude. I found some values in the website Intrinsic Johnson-Cousins UBVI Colors of M Dwarf Standard Stars.
In there data I was able to find 8 M stars in the data. The code to find the M stars is the folder scripts/misc/Spectra/Mstars.
The 8 found M stars are:
python ['./pointing32_2014-07-27/ngc6397id000005965jd2456866p5198f002.fits', './pointing24_2014-07-26/ngc6397id000013685jd2456865p6268f000.fits', './pointing23_2014-07-27/ngc6397id000009200jd2456866p5029f002.fits', './pointing22_2014-07-26/ngc6397id000003913jd2456865p6209f002.fits', './pointing12_2014-07-29/ngc6397id000008220jd2456868p6022f002.fits', './pointing34_2014-07-26/ngc6397id000014834jd2456865p6115f000.fits', './pointing51_2014-08-01/ngc6397id000000308jd2456871p6149f000.fits', './pointing31_2014-08-01/ngc6397id000000963jd2456871p6333f002.fits']
The third one is a bit weird so we get the fluxes for the other 7 in the same filters R and H\(\alpha\) for Hubble.
Variability and Magnitudes in the CVs
The basecode is called flux.py and it is in the /scripts/misc/Spectra/fitting folder.
These are the results along in the numbers from (Cohn et al. 2010) and (Kaluzny et al. 2006).
R Magnitudes
CV | R Magnitude | (Cohn et al. 2010) R |
---|---|---|
U17 | 20.12 | 18.52 |
U23 | 19.15 | 17.88 |
U10 | 20.7 | 19.14 |
U21 | 19.79 | 19.82 |
U22 | 18.54 | 20.15 |
Equivalent Width of H\(\beta\) line
CV | EW H\(\beta\) (\(\mathring{A}\)) |
---|---|
U17 | \(11.65 \pm 0.17\) |
U23 | \(15.13 \pm 0.7\) |
U10 | \(15.44 \pm 0.2\) |
The data
M stars
for i in a:
iraf.wspectext(i, 'M'+i.split('d')[1].replace('0','')+'spectra.txt', header=False)`
import flux
Again the ID is from the [@anderson_acs_2008]
cvU17={'name':'U17','R':flux.getflux('U17','f625w'), 'Halpha':flux.getflux('U17','f658n')}
cvU23={'name':'U23','R':flux.getflux('U23','f625w'), 'Halpha':flux.getflux('U23','f658n')}
cvU19={'name':'U19','R':flux.getflux('U19','f625w'), 'Halpha':flux.getflux('U19','f658n')}
cvU10={'name':'U10','R':flux.getflux('U10','f625w'), 'Halpha':flux.getflux('U10','f658n')}
cvU21={'name':'U21','R':flux.getflux('U21','f625w'), 'Halpha':flux.getflux('U21','f658n')}
cvU25={'name':'U25','R':flux.getflux('U25','f625w'), 'Halpha':flux.getflux('U25','f658n')}
M13685j={'name':'M13685j','R':flux.getflux('M13685j','f625w'), 'Halpha':flux.getflux('M13685j','f658n')}
M14834j={'name':'M14834j','R':flux.getflux('M14834j','f625w'), 'Halpha':flux.getflux('M14834j','f658n')}
M38j={'name':'M38j','R':flux.getflux('M38j','f625w'), 'Halpha':flux.getflux('M38j','f658n')}
M3913j={'name':'M3913j','R':flux.getflux('M3913j','f625w'), 'Halpha':flux.getflux('M3913j','f658n')}
M5965j={'name':'M5965j','R':flux.getflux('M5965j','f625w'), 'Halpha':flux.getflux('M5965j','f658n')}
M822j={'name':'M822j','R':flux.getflux('M822j','f625w'), 'Halpha':flux.getflux('M822j','f658n')}
M963j={'name':'M963j','R':flux.getflux('M963j','f625w'), 'Halpha':flux.getflux('M963j','f658n')}
Problems
Maybe I need to cut VEGa to fit my observation. I dont know. I am getting a Halpha flux bigger than the R flux and it should be like that. Ti is a narrow vs wide field
References
Anderson, Jay, Ata Sarajedini, Luigi R. Bedin, Ivan R. King, Giampaolo Piotto, I. Neill Reid, Michael Siegel, et al. 2008. “An ACS Survey of Globular Clusters. V. Generating a Comprehensive Star Catalog for Each Cluster.” The Astronomical Journal 135 (6): 2055. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/135/6/2055.
Cohn, Haldan N., Phyllis M. Lugger, Sean M. Couch, Jay Anderson, Adrienne M. Cool, Maureen van den Berg, Slavko Bogdanov, Craig O. Heinke, and Jonathan E. Grindlay. 2010. “Identification of Faint Chandra X-Ray Sources in the Core-Collapsed Globular Cluster NGC 6397: Evidence for a Bimodal Cataclysmic Variable Population.” The Astrophysical Journal 722 (October): 20–32. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/722/1/20.
Kaluzny, J., I. B. Thompson, W. Krzeminski, and A. Schwarzenberg-Czerny. 2006. “Photometric Study of the Variable Star Population in the Globular Cluster NGC 6397.” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 365 (January): 548–54. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09734.x.