Explosion in size and complexity of data sets
Large Spectroscopic Surveys
The Challenges
Data size and complexity
Noise:
Filter Glitches, Skylines, Cosmic Rays
Feature Extraction:
$T_{eff}$, log(g), [Fe/H]
Classification: .
Dimensionality Reduction Methods
The Data
SEGUE: Sloan Extension for Galactic Understanding and Exploration
Principal Component Analysis of SDSS Stellar Spectra
Matrix
5000 stars X 2000
82 Line Index (EW)
Atomic and molecular lines.
5 components:
Spectra Reconstruction
PCA Decomposition Results
Correlations eigencoefficients and stellar parameters:
First components related to $T_{eff}$
Smaller singular values related to log(g)
$T_{eff}$ Calibration
"A PCA approach to stellar effective temperatures" Muñoz Bermejo, J et. al 2013
Applied to Library of Synthetic Spectra
$$T_{eff} = T_0 + \sum ^C _{j=1} a_j PC_j + \sum ^C _{j=1} b_j PC_j^2 \, \, + \, \, ...$$
First Component and $T_{eff}$
2 Dimension
First Component and $T_{eff}$
3 Dimension
Classification: Unsupervised
Goal: Discover structure in the data
Plot Reduced-dimension representation
Linear Decomposition
Non-Linear Decomposition
Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (tSNE)
Conclusions
Dimensionality reduction methods like PCA and t-SNE can be used to efficiently target the future challenges with the huge increase of spectroscopic data soon available from future and ongoing all-sky surveys.
Future Work
More data
Try with >5000 stars
Giants, Dwarfs. Late type stars ...
Supervised Learning:
PCA can be combined with ANN
Outliers:
Take a closer look at outliers
Hidden Accretors, Binaries, misclassified stars ...?
Use Line Index:
Matrix of Equivalent Width
Radial Velocity, Distance, Emission lines ...
Gracias
Department of Physics and Astronomy